For
the past two years, I’ve been in three different schools, but I’ve never
experienced math the way CASD does it. Math, without a doubt, is my favorite
subject. Well, it was my favorite subject. I’ve
always had good grades in any math-related subject, and I still do, but not as
good as they used to be. I used to enjoy math, but I don’t anymore.
The
College Preparatory Math (CPM) program hasn’t been useful to me or any of the classmates I’ve spoken to
with respect to the progress the program has made in our understanding of
mathematics. According to some students, the fact that the program is designed
to work with other people does not help them to succeed in completing the
assignments. They have to go home and try to teach themselves. They also
specified that the teachers aren’t the ones with the problem, but the program
is.
The teachers have said that the program has a better impact on the students who have
higher levels of understanding the language of English. Because of the
complex wording that the problems use, some of the students get behind and
instead of trying, they just give up and try to move on.
According to the
philosophy of CPM: “Mathematics should not frustrate anyone to the point of
giving up.” Students ARE giving up. They are experiencing frustration from the execution of the program.
Sadly, I know I’m not the first student to talk about this. Last year, a group of students decided to raise their voices to try and make a change in the
math program but no change was made. The numbers that my
classmates discovered express that since 2015, when the CPM program was
incorporated to the school, the number of students scoring below basic in the
Keystone exams have almost tripled and with respect to the PSSA results 2014
through 2017 the results were shocking. (See our recent post "Is CASD Misrepresenting its Test Scores" for updated information on these statistics.)
Last year 351 students were surveyed regarding CPM
- 144 students hated CPM while only 8 loved it
- 203 students believed CPM is confusing & makes concepts more difficult
- 178 students believe they aren't prepared for the next level of math
- 214 students believe CPM should be replaced; 97 said maybe; only 40 students said it should not be replaced
- More than half of the students believe that CPM is hurting them
Written By Lenny Bucio
Editor's Note: CPM relies on students discovering how to do the problems through discovery with peers. CCAP wanted to let the community know that the last year when students spoke about their concerns at the school board meeting, the math teachers were observed for that week. It was in the last week of school, during final examination time. Teachers were told to continue instruction in classes that had finished their examinations. What was relayed to the administrators who were not in attendance at the meeting, was that the students said the teachers weren't teaching. The students' message was loud and clear:
CPM isn't working for them and the program should be discontinued.
Refreshing, Informative and I'm personally grateful for you guys digging up the facts. God bless y'all keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteYou Can Drop The Mic Now
WOW.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank you Lenny and to the many other students who have previously spoken out. Also, thanks to all those who bravely participated in the survey. You know it must be bad when students begin to speak out. What is the district’s policy on evaluating the success or failure of new programs after implementation? The test score mentioned above is certainly one measure. But teacher and student feedback is another. They must feel free to speak up and know they’re being heard!
ReplyDeleteMy child definitely is not succeeding in the CPM math program. We have provided feedback on the program and met with resistance from administration. I saw the reaction last year and was specifically told that the reaction to the student feedback was, "when teachers are not teaching, we need to do something!" I was at the board meeting and the students did not say the teachers were not teaching, but did say that the minimization of direct instruction in the CPM model was detrimental to their learning. Thank you to Lenny for sharing your perspective, which is shared by so many students at CASD.
ReplyDelete